Does the Fifth Circuit's interpretation of 'all other available and reasonable means' in 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(1)(A)(ii) violate statutory interpretation principles and create separation of powers and due process problems?

(1) Does the Fifth Circuit’s interpretation of the phrase “all other available and reasonable means” in 18 U.S.C. § 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(1)(A)(ii) to mean a “ court order” authorizing the “turnover” of a restitution debtor’s property —when no federal or state enforcement law authorizes such an order —violate the rules of statutory interpretation and, in doing so, create separation of powers and due process problems? (2) Does the Fifth Circuit’s interpretation of the lien provision in 18 U.S.C. § 3613(c) violate th e rules of statutory interpretation and, in doing so, expand the scope of the government’s power to encumber and seize private property ?