Whether the good faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule applies to Title III wiretap orders that are insufficient on their face, and whether a wiretap order failing to identify the DOJ official authorizing the application requires suppression

WHETHER THE "GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION" TO THE FOURTH 1. AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE OF UNITED STATES VS. LEON , 468 U.S, 897 (1987), APPLIES TO TITLE III WIRETAP ORDERS THAT ARE "INSUFFICIENT ON IT'S FACE" UNDER 18 TO RESOLVE A SPLIT AMONG THE CIRCUITS? WHETHER A WIRETAP ORDER THAT FAILS TO IDENTIFY THE 2. D.O.J. OFFICIAL AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION IS A TECHNICAL DEFECT UNDER 18 U.S.C.§2518(4) (d) OR REQUIRES SUPPRESSION UNDER 18 U.S.C. §§2515 AND 2518 (10)(a)(ii), (c); IN LIGHT OF DAHDA VS. UNITED STATES, 584 U.S. 440 (2018), TO RESOLVE A SPLIT AMONG THE CIRCUITS? (i)