No. 24-6425

Cameron Cates v. Jared Shlemovitz, dba Junto Sounds, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: copyright-law creative-works judicial-interpretation legal-petition procedural-fairness public-domain
Key Terms:
Copyright
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How is it that, according to the Second Circuit, 'all on the common wellspring that is the creative works draw public domain,'? What good is copyright law and its definitions when it only protects the well funded? Why, after following the original Judge Kahn's instructions to amend my petition, did my favorable arguments get twisted by Judge Nardacci, the replacement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

How is it that, according to the Second Circuit, "all on the common wellspring that is the creative works draw public domain,"? What good is copyright law and its definitions when only protects the well funded ?it Why, after following the original Judge Kahn's instruct ions to ammend my petition, did my favorable arguments get twisted by Judge Nardacci, the replacement? 2 .

Docket Entries

2025-04-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent Jared Schlemovitz to respond filed.
2025-02-06
Waiver of Procter & Gamble Co, Grey Global Group LLC, WPP Group USA, Inc. of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-06
Waiver of right of respondents Procter & Gamble Co, Grey Global Group LLC, WPP Group USA, Inc. to respond filed.
2025-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Cameron Cates
Cameron Cates — Petitioner
Jared Schlemovitz
Kasey T. MahoneyGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Respondent
Procter & Gamble Co, Grey Global Group LLC, WPP Group USA, Inc.
Jennifer Tafet KlausnerDavis & Gilbert LLP, Respondent