Whether state prosecutors and witnesses can commit perjury and evidence tampering without constitutional consequences

I. GROUND ONE: It is unconstitutional to allow state witnesses to commit perjury, as well as the State prosecutors to commit subornation of perjury, and the tampering of evidence. GROUND TWO: Trial counsel provides ineffective assistance of counsel when it withheld evidence and did not call fourth an expert witness on matters concerning scientific evidence. GROUND THREE: Insufficient “DNA ” evidence, fraudulent analysis of “Serologist Joseph Serowik, ” State of Ohio ’s two laboratories testing ’s were compromised, with two contradictive results on same “DNA ” evidence analyzed. GROUND FOUR: State of Ohio is in violation of “Treaty ” pursuant the “Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, ” (IADA). Article III. (a), and IV. (c). O.R.C.2963.30. Article 1, 10, U.S. Constitution. Violation of VI, and IVX Amendments of U.S. Constitution.