No. 24-6437
Armando Molina v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
Punishment Privacy Jurisdiction
Punishment Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to determine the objectives of one's own defense is violated when defense counsel, against the defendant's wishes, stipulates to presentation of an entrapment defense in which guilt is conceded
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to determine the objectives of one’s own defense is violated when defense counsel, against the defendant’s wishes, stipulates to presentation of an entrapment defense in which guilt is conceded. STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-14
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)
Attorneys
Armando Molina
Katherine Windsor — Law Office of Katherine Kimball Windsor, Petitioner
Katherine Windsor — Law Office of Katherine Kimball Windsor, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent