No. 24-6445

Neelam Uppal v. Florida Department of Administrative Hearings, et al.

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-02-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-jurisdiction constitutional-violations due-process florida-supreme-court judicial-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Florida Supreme Court err in dismissing the appeal and consequently failed to address the constitutional violations raised

Question Presented (from Petition)

The Supreme Court of Florida held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the Petitioner ’s appeal. The Court stated that it lacked jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. The Petitioner avers that there exists grave constitutional violations that were left unaddressed and that the Supreme Court failed to address conclusively. The question presented is: Did the Florida Supreme Court err in dismissing the appeal and consequently failed to address the constitutional violations raised. 2.

Docket Entries

2025-04-07
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2024-04-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2025)

Attorneys

Neelam Uppal
Neelam T. Uppal — Petitioner
Neelam T. Uppal — Petitioner