When plaintiffs have established ongoing injuries traceable to defendants' policies, does Article III require a particularized factual determination of redressability following a declaratory judgment?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This petition presents two questions. The first question is nearly identical to the question this Court is currently considering in Gutierrez v. Saenz, No. 23-7809 (oral argument scheduled for Feb. 24, 2025). (1) When plaintiffs have established their ongoing injuries are traceable to defendants’ policies and practices, does Article III require a particularized factual determination of whether a federal agency or official will redress plaintiffs’ injuries following a favorable declaratory judgment that resolves the constitutional controversy? (2) Whether exceptions exist to the three demanding conditions for mandamus articulated in Cheney v. U.S. District Court for District of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004).