Whether a Florida court's denial of post-conviction relief for a sexual battery conviction violates the petitioner's constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment

I* Should F\of\Aa's CouvfK coKvHnue 4t) be 4r> _ . ntuAx) «w+e<i &udS* unJw S^o.^^c)^ FU.SMr.j u,U]<Mhm^ mol«+ef it&uAVps a conun*iH«A fc of offense. of cloiU iwW&J^ ’Swck msuks Trx -Hw^SwJ^ 8" or-Hieaccused U»S, F<d«ra\C®4^» r^W" 4* dlacbtooeis a«iof irtria\ , UXC.A. (X^A aqmLs, gjjhfify .ufe. a Ulky sWwlA AvS CoafVA to Fief td<\ -fo contour 4c ke one. of only-ftOO <£tfzcbeS in •pk<2' Ufvv^J) Stales (jllouiSiaAa) 4o ha&o?\l frfe, taliVodb patfoV sentervoe rof & Sexual Baftevy tt^oW a chtla Cov\U vioKo/\? hFoafV^-(W oaVt Sh&eS do r\gr vn<wAajbe/ 4h4r^A inMunl d Te. in ptis*i Rf 4ta Sa^e e^iyjXdi^ iw^bwa Flomaayi^4fe.wie nunHicf. reii<h$Aei ts ncAfainV] $ptoJ-W&? Sw&qcz, l^ew t£ uy\Oi^^jfera.\ W^uAia<^H6f^ ;/a:l-W p^Mionef 'falser VW14is +716 compote af any §€a4^jocay\c^ d^pk'^OA by. FIo'Ada4rW\ afSi<Lf 4ta#vta « Vv\Ama^ an. indWuWA ate in Dfvsbva toJAocj^-any SeFnuwk/ of^ £iwe;w^ de^iV\;uJi[dk p/isMuhs" ex cruel punkkme/Fav^ b€^u£e^Vv£ only o^cufX m FWjAa a^LewsWiX ,conSiik(kf an umSwA v/o [aWc -Me. <efud ana Unusual T\vxf\isUvnen4§ ol<mSe£ or 4m. £~d fom Arwm.ffl.eytt 4o 44e. Ui.S. ^tvpkiu.4toa f a*\R 4r4iae. / Sedtifa 17, ofAa, FloWcU UvS*C A £ / f <3^. Aft-, \ ir (7»naan (Sn^hfuircn -> Vv^ kjou* FWvda be* Vew4oOondlucA-4-W p£4\pMei£C 4tux ccxpudcfmcof C^ v4bX S^wwA RffW/ upon <\ ckMvConxji^ltvt? Wn e^vmef ky a AuW Wofisas ©Ponly ctS, uiAefe. pe^inks tonoicKoo fWTW a f/J*/ ‘, ‘!\ F,Joni Wi44»u4 ®arale . oMJ}& S*cU pMotefgho uU WepiW 4* a,/p wy ? Pe.^oA<ar ntverp^WW his co/tfrwtfwi , ftqVw*fo a /$ vtc&AAixtV) anu-lrial <s^f fed anyp^vsoiS v^a\voT rtotn pe^ibfon^ />7 V/olaiioA of'peixAion^sc? S/Wi an£./Surfeenfn ot~ 4\e. UnlHa Spates oc>nS4i4a4ibr\ «► • A* Ipf/Vj f'ldL.C&t&lr. l ^of ^ u.s.c