No. 24-6451

Devon Maurice Gray v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-03
Status: GVR
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: bruen-test constitutional-law gun-rights rahimi-precedent second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment methodology set forth in Bruen and Rahimi

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether under the Second Amendment methodology set forth in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) , as clarified in United States v. Rahimi , 602 U.S. 680 (2024), 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional. ii INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 14.1(b)(i), Petitioner submits that there are no

Docket Entries

2025-05-09
Judgment Issued.
2025-04-07
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. 680 (2024).
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-03-13
Reply of Devon Gray submitted.
2025-03-13
Reply of petitioner Devon Gray filed.
2025-03-13
Reply of petitioner Devon Maurice Gray filed.
2025-03-10
Memorandum For the United States of United States submitted.
2025-03-10
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-02-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 4, 2025.
2025-02-27
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-02-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 5, 2025 to April 4, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2025)

Attorneys

Devon Gray
Brenda Greenberg BrynFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brenda Greenberg BrynFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent