No. 24-6457
Darrell Blount v. Administrator, New Jersey State Prison
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process expert-testimony eyewitness-testimony fair-trial show-up-identification
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the admission of an unreliable show-up identification violated the petitioner's due process rights and whether the exclusion of an eyewitness identification expert testimony violated the right to present a complete defense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL BY THE ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE OF AN UNRELIABLE SHOW-UP IDENTIFICATION IN VIOLATION OF HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS. Il. WHETHER THE EXCLUSION AT TRIAL OF PETITIONER’S EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION EXPERT VIOLATED PETITIONER’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRESENT A COMPLETE DEFENSE.
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-03-04
Waiver of Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. to respond filed.
2025-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2025)
Attorneys
Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.
Darrell Blount
Mark Allan Berman — Hartmann Doherty Rosa Berman & Bulbulia LLP, Petitioner