No. 24-6459
Kyle Anthony Shephard v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review consent-review criminal-law due-process judicial-procedure standard-of-review
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the voluntariness of a defendant's consent always be reviewed de novo?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Due to a lack of guidance from the Supreme Court, lower courts apply a variety of standards of review to the issue of whether an individual’s consent was voluntary: clear error, de novo, and a mix of the two. Should the voluntariness of a defendant’s consent always be reviewed de novo? prefix PARTIES,
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
Reply of petitioner Kyle Anthony Shephard filed. (Distributed)
2025-06-11
Reply of Kyle Shephard submitted.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-05-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-05-28
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-04-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 28, 2025.
2025-04-24
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 28, 2025 to May 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 28, 2025.
2025-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 28, 2025 to April 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-21
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-02-26
Response Requested. (Due March 28, 2025)
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-14
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2025)
Attorneys
Kyle Shephard
James Michael Chavez — Law Office of James M. Chavez, Petitioner
James Michael Chavez — Law Office of James M. Chavez, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent