No. 24-6459

Kyle Anthony Shephard v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review consent-review criminal-law due-process judicial-procedure standard-of-review
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the voluntariness of a defendant's consent always be reviewed de novo?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Due to a lack of guidance from the Supreme Court, lower courts apply a variety of standards of review to the issue of whether an individual’s consent was voluntary: clear error, de novo, and a mix of the two. Should the voluntariness of a defendant’s consent always be reviewed de novo? prefix PARTIES,

Docket Entries

2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
2025-06-11
Reply of Kyle Shephard submitted.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-05-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-05-28
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-04-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 28, 2025.
2025-04-24
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 28, 2025 to May 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 28, 2025.
2025-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 28, 2025 to April 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-21
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-02-26
Response Requested. (Due March 28, 2025)
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-14
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-29

Attorneys

Kyle Shephard
James Michael ChavezLaw Office of James M. Chavez, Petitioner
James Michael ChavezLaw Office of James M. Chavez, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent