No. 24-6461

David James Lack v. Dr. Posner, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process medical-treatment plea-agreement prison-conditions speedy-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Trial Court in Violation of the Plaintiffs State and Federal Speedy-Trial Rights, Defendant's Medical Treatment, and Due Process Rights by Forcing a Plea Agreement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Was the Trial Court in Violation of the Plaintiffs State and Federal Speedy-Trial Rights. Plaintiff constantly asking for a speedy trial for over 4 years. . 2. Was the Trial Court in Violation of defendant's Medical Treatment after being rushed to the hospital from the prison (twice) and diagnosed with a stomach tumor by Gastrologist Specialist Dr. Tabbaa. Prison Officials and the Trial Court refused to adhere to Dr. Tabbaa's recommendations for further testing and treatment. 3. Was the Trial Court(s) in Violation of Loss of Concurrent Sentences by Trial Court, Kellett, Prop 57, Plata Fed Rule by not ruling on Kellett after setting it aside and did not take it back up as Plaintiff was sent off to State Prison. 4. Is the Trial Court in Violation of Plaintiffs due-process rights by making his sign a plea agreements so he can be released to receive his cancer treatment as recommended by Specialist.

Docket Entries

2025-04-07
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-02-10
Waiver of Dr. Posner, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-10
Waiver of right of respondents Defendants-Appellees Koenig, Moller, Posson, and Skipper-Dotta to respond filed.
2025-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2025)

Attorneys

David J. Lack
David James Lack — Petitioner
Dr. Posner, et al.
Jaime Michelle GansonState of California, Attorney General's Office, Respondent