Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the case for failure to state a claim, statute of limitations, and res judicata, and whether the court abused its discretion by refusing to review the complaint and accompanying exhibits
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1) WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY DISMISSING PETITIONER ’S CASE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OR INSUFFICIENT PLEADING, EXPIRATION OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND RES JUDICATA? 2) WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY REFUSING TO REVIEW AND EXAMINE THE COMPLAINT WITHIN ITS FOUR CORNER LIMITS AND APPLY ALL THE ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS TO THE CAUSES OF ACTION AND THE FAILURE TO ESTABLISH THE BURDEN OF PROOF TO REFUTE THE FACTUAL CONTENTS THEREIN? 11
2025-04-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2025-03-27
Waiver of Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, et al. to respond filed.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2025)