No. 24-6469

Ramien Collins v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the appellate court commit reversible error by denying Petitioner's direct appeal due to violations of the Confrontation Clause and Sixth Amendment right to counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Did the appellate commit reversible err denying Petitioner's direct appeal on the issue where the district court allowed the admission of chemical analysis reports into evidence during trial although it knew that the chemical analyst would not be present which would be a violation of the Confrontation Clause? Did the appellate court commit reversible denying Petitioner's direct appeal on the issue where Petitioner's appellate attorney filed a Adders Brief seaking;a withdrawals from Petitioner's case as his appellate attorney and granted Petitioner's appellate attorney's request and denied Petitioner's request for another appellate attorney which violated Petitioner's Sixth Amendment which guarantee him the right to counsel during his Due Process and direct appeal proceedings during criminal proceedings?

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-14
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2025)

Attorneys

Ramien Collins
Ramien Collins — Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent