Ramien Collins v. United States
DueProcess
Did the appellate court commit reversible error by denying Petitioner's direct appeal due to violations of the Confrontation Clause and Sixth Amendment right to counsel?
Did the appellate commit reversible err denying Petitioner's direct appeal on the issue where the district court allowed the admission of chemical analysis reports into evidence during trial although it knew that the chemical analyst would not be present which would be a violation of the Confrontation Clause? Did the appellate court commit reversible denying Petitioner's direct appeal on the issue where Petitioner's appellate attorney filed a Adders Brief seaking;a withdrawals from Petitioner's case as his appellate attorney and granted Petitioner's appellate attorney's request and denied Petitioner's request for another appellate attorney which violated Petitioner's Sixth Amendment which guarantee him the right to counsel during his Due Process and direct appeal proceedings during criminal proceedings?