Does the Supreme Court ruling in Erlinger v. United States render unconstitutional ACCA enhancements when predicate charges were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury?

Does the recent Supreme Court ruling in *Erlinger v. United 1. States*, 602 U.S. (2024), render unconstitutional the enhancements imposed under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) when the associated charges were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury?. Did the Fifth Circuit err in denying a Certificate of 2. Appealability by incorrectly asserting that a ground was not argued in the 2255 motion, despite evidence indicating otherwise? 3. Was the district court ’s denial of the 2255 motion erroneous due to the failure of the prosecution to prove that the predicate offenses used to enhance under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) qualify as such? 4. Is the application of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(e) relevant to the arguments presented in Ground 11 of the 2255 motion? (ii)