No. 24-6481

Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights judicial-review legal-standard liberal-construction pro-se-pleadings procedural-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does this court construe the pleadings liberally and hold them to a less stringent standard than those filed by attorneys?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

6V£R 71 YEA&5 OLD WITH NO CRIMINALJr Petitioner stampone is NI STORY, WAS ARRESTED IN THE SAME COUNTS WARRENT WAS ISSUED ON TRUMPED UP CHARGES OF KIDNAPPING HlS WIFE ANO GiUALlFIFO FOR A SPEEDS TRIAL. PETITIONER ACERTED HiS RIGHT Pod A SPEEOy TRIAL IN OPEN COURT AND BY WAY OF MoTloN* WAS MR. STAMPDMt DENIED HlS CON STlTuTl ONA L RIGHT To A SPEEDY TRIAL BY ZI MONTHS OF DELAY THAT RESULTED IN SIGNIFICANT PREJUDICE To DEFENSE AN DEFENDANT] TRIAL Court ANSWERED ; Mo PETITIONER ANSWERED 1 V£5 XL-15 MR. STAMPONE' s SENTENCE THAT 15 NEARLY TWIC6 OF THE GlUIDE LINES MINIMUM SENTENCE RANGE A Disproportionate sentence ? trial court answered : no Petitioner answered .' Yes HE‘DID MR, STAAAPoNE E XHAULT. ALL HlS STATE R6MIDIE5 ON THESE TWO ISSUES ? UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS REHEARING AN5W ER* No petitioner answered .' yet TV-IS Ml* STAAAPONE ENTITLE To MoNEToRY DAMAGES IN A Complaint ? UNITED STATES DISTRICT Court ANSWERED ' N0 PETITIONER ANSWERED fYES V'DoES THIS COURT NEED To ENTER A RULE STATING ALL states Courts shall ^kHault Plaintiff ' m&Rcnudies WITH IN THREE YEARS OR PLAINTIFF SHALL BE RuLEO THAT HE EKHAULTED HlS STATE REMIDIES 1 united states supreme court answered :-petitioner answered : Yes TZT' Does this court construes the pleadings liberally and holds THEM LESS STRINGENT STANDARD THAN FILED BY ATTORNEY 5 ? 2 I '\j

Docket Entries

2025-04-07
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2024-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Frederick Stampone
Frederick Stampone — Petitioner
Frederick Stampone — Petitioner