No. 24-6483

Schelton Jones v. California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-management court-procedure docket-numbering judicial-administration legal-documentation procedural-uniformity
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a court's docket numbering process violates procedural uniformity or chronological standards

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

My o|ooUe^r wth the, dishncf courfwas Upda+ed and labeled witV\ sequential numbersI ha, docket I had w)rHa coaH of appacjs i/Jas hct tin&li-z_ed or designated "ft 4h|& Same, manner or chronological ^°dus operand^ . Wihy?

Docket Entries

2025-06-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-04-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-03-31
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
2025-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2024-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2025)

Attorneys

California
Thomas Stuart PattersonOffice of the CA Atty. General, Respondent
Thomas Stuart PattersonOffice of the CA Atty. General, Respondent
Schelton Jones
Schelton Jones — Petitioner
Schelton Jones — Petitioner