No. 24-6486
Lucious Boyd v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review federal-procedure habeas-corpus prisoner-rights second-petition statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2025-06-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether § 2244(b)(2) applies to habeas filings after appellate review, to all second-in-time habeas filings, or to some second-in-time filings based on specific criteria
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Capital Case The question presented is: Whether § 2244(b)(2) applies (i) to habeas filings made after a prisoner has exhausted appellate review of his first petition, (ii) to all second -in-time habeas filings after final judgement, or (iii) to some second -in-time filings, depending on a prisoner’s succes s on appeal or ability to satisfy a seven -factor test .
Docket Entries
2025-06-23
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/5/2025.
2025-05-16
Reply of Lucious Boyd submitted.
2025-05-16
Reply of petitioner Lucious Boyd filed.
2025-05-06
Brief of respondent Ricky D. Dixon Secretary, Florida, Department of Corrections in opposition filed.
2025-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 6, 2025.
2025-02-25
Motion of Secretary, Florida, Department of Corrections for an extension of time submitted.
2025-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 7, 2025 to May 6, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Lucious Boyd
James L. Driscoll Jr. — James L. Driscoll Jr. , Petitioner
James L. Driscoll Jr. — James L. Driscoll Jr. , Petitioner
Secretary, Florida, Department of Corrections
Lisa-Marie Krause Lerner — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent