Whether the Court of Appeals created a circuit conflict regarding the elements of a federal statute requiring proof or pleading of specific elements

DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, WHEN ISSUING ITS OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. HITE, 769 F.3d 1154 (D.C. C . Cir. 2014) CREATE A CONFLICT WITH THE OPINION ISSUED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN UNITED STATES V. MURRELL, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2004) ?1) 2) DOES THES CONFLICT ADDRESSED ABOVE CREATED A SCENARIO'WHERE A DEFENDANT [VV lMAYDBEI FOUND GUILTY OF A VIOLATION OF A FEDERAL STATUTE IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT WITHOUT PROOF OR PLEADING OF AN ELEMENT REQUIRED IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT FOR A VIOLATION OF THE' SAME STATUTE? DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FORTHEDELEVENTH CIRCUIT, WHEN ISSUEING THE OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. LEE, 603 F.3d 904 (11th Cir. 2010) CREATE AN INNER_CIRCUIT CONFLICT, SUSEPTABLE TO THE SAME HAZARD AS SUGGESTED IN QUESTION 2 ABOVE?3) 4) ARE THE CONFLICTS ASSERTED ABOVE "REAL AND EMBARASSING, " WARRANTING THE EXERCISE OF THIS COURT'S DISCRETION TO GRANT AN EXTRAORDINARY :WRIT TO RESOLVE SUCH CONFLICT(S)? i