No. 24-6513
Tavon Johnathon Magee v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-claims effective-assistance-of-counsel federal-standard habeas-relief sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Has Petitioner Magee made a proper showing of actual innocence to have his constitutional claims addressed on the merits, and should the Supreme Court establish a federal standard for entitlement to relief on a freestanding claim of actual innocence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. HAS PETITIONER MAGEE MADE A PROPER SHOWING OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE TO HAVE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS ADDRESSED ON THE MERITS? II. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD ESTABLISH A FEDERAL STANDARD FOR ENTITLEMENT TO RELIEF ON A FREESTANDING CLAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE? III. WAS PETITIONER MAGEE DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR HIS DEFENSE?
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2024-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 12, 2025)