No. 24-6515

Joseph T. Shine-Johnson v. Shelbie Smith, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review habeas-corpus judicial-finality merits-review procedural-grounds rule-60b
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a petitioner can use Rule 60(b) to gain Relief of Judgment from a legal error that precluded merits review when habeas relief was denied on flawed procedural grounds, despite exhausting all available appellate remedies

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Can a petitioner use the 60(b) Rule to gain Relief of Judgment from a legal error that precluded a merits review, when habeas relief was denied by the district court on flawed procedural grounds, after he properly exhausted all available appellate remedies pursuant to 2254 or does the prior COA determination creates a binding legal decision, thus thwarting 60(b) in the interest of finality? n

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2024-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 12, 2025)

Attorneys

Joseph T. Shine-Johnson
Joseph T. Shine-Johnson — Petitioner
Joseph T. Shine-Johnson — Petitioner