No. 24-6535

Christopher Vitti v. Kevin Brian Jones, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: district-court equitable-remedy statute-extension subject-matter-jurisdiction supreme-court tort-claim
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the ninth district court error in finding that there's no equitable remedy to make an extension of statute, and can the Supreme Court under 28 U.S. Code § 2072 make a remedy for this tort claim by making an extension to the statute?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : 1 questions 1 Did the ninth district court error in finding that there ’s no equitable remedy to make an extension of statute ; and if the ninth district didn ’t error, can the Supreme Court under 28 U.S. Code § 2072 make a remedy for this tort claim by making an extension to the statute?2 3 2 Is delay a form of a loss of liberty, justice and due process when having to climb the courts just to remedy a grievance; or does an action require a day in court for trial or a hearing to be considered consistent with due process?4 53 Should have the lowest federal court offered counsel when in forma pauperis due to the analog nature of 18 U.S. Code § 241 and 42 U.S. Code § 1983?6 4 Did the lower court error in holding that it couldn't look into state proceedings for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; or did the lower court improperly decide on the full faith and credit clause which led to lack of subject matter jurisdiction?7 85 Did the lower court error in finding that the right to papers isn’t clearly established law? 96 Did the lower court error on the state's 11th amendment immunity? 10 7 Did the lower court error in holding that the plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief? 8 Did the lower court improperly apply Imbler v Pachtman in a way to completely do away with Brady vs Maryland and its progeny cases?11 129 Is there also a first amendment or common law right or both, to court records and writings when the vehicle used is the Freedom of Information Act or the State equivalent (CPRA)? 13 10 In regard to all the failures to state a claim and failure to state enough facts, may I in the interest of Justice, amend all relevant pleadings like in Rule 15. (A)(2) so granted at the mercy of this court; and if this court sees fit to remand this case back to the lower courts for a new trial with time to amend the complaint in its entirety?14 15 NAME OF PLAINTIFF Christopher Vitti 16 NAME OF DEFENDANTS KEVIN BRIAN JONES, COURTNEY WILLIAMS, VERONICA HISOIRE, ADAM SEPT, ESPERANZA ESPARZA, DIANA STANLEY, TODD ZOCCHI, KATHERINE MICKS, EDWIN MIRAMONTES, DEL NORTE SUPERIOR COURT, and DEL NORTE COUNTY17 18 19 20 21 2

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-02-14
Waiver of right of respondents County of Del Norte, Deanna Emsaeel, Diana Stanley, Katherine Micks, Todd Zocchi, and Edwin Miramontes to respond filed.
2025-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Officer Adam Sept. to respond filed.
2025-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 12, 2025)

Attorneys

Christopher Vitti
Christopher Vitti — Petitioner
Christopher Vitti — Petitioner
County of Del Norte, Deanna Emsaeel, Diana Stanley, Katherine Micks, Todd Zocchi, and Edwin Miramontes
Nicholas R. KloeppelMithcell, Brisso, Delaney & Vrieze, LLP, Respondent
Nicholas R. KloeppelMithcell, Brisso, Delaney & Vrieze, LLP, Respondent
Officer Adam Sept.
Lauren CanterCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Lauren CanterCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent