No. 24-6540
Narey Perez-Quibus v. United States
Tags: bruen-test constitutional-methodology gun-rights rahimi-standard second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether under the Second Amendment methodology set forth in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen and United States v. Rahimi, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether under the Second Amendment methodology set forth in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen , 597 U.S. 1 (2022) , as clarified in United States v. Rahimi , 602 U.S. 680 (2024), 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstit utional. ii INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 14.1(b)(i), Petitioner submits that there are no
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-18
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2025)
2024-12-20
Application (24A620) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 15, 2025.
2024-12-18
Application (24A620) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 16, 2025 to February 18, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Narey Perez-Quibus
Brenda Greenberg Bryn — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brenda Greenberg Bryn — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent