No. 24-6544
Lemack Bellot v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting attempt-crime criminal-conduct ninth-circuit reverse-sting statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision that 'aiding and abetting an attempt' and 'attempting to aid and abet' are equivalent permits wholly fictitious conduct to be rendered criminal by the government's use of reverse sting operations?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1) W hethe r the Ninth Circuit’s decision that “aiding and abetting an attempt” and “attempting to aid and abet” are equivalent permits wholly fictitious conduct to me rendered criminal by the government’s use of reverse sting operations?
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2025)
Attorneys
Lemack Bellot
Dena Marie Young — Law Offices of Dena Marie Young, Petitioner
Dena Marie Young — Law Offices of Dena Marie Young, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent