No. 24-6545
Rangsey Arundech Pich v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure judicial-interpretation sentencing written-order
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a reviewing court may find ambiguity by going beyond the words used by the district court when pronouncing the relevant decision
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
In federal criminal proceedings, circui t courts agree that an unambiguous oral pronouncement overrides a subsequent inconsistent written order. Courts are divided, however, about what an appella te court may consider when determining ambiguity. The question for the Court to resolve is whether a reviewing court may find ambiguity by going beyond the words used by the district court when pronouncing the relevant decision. prefix PARTIES ,
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2025)
Attorneys
Rangsey Arundech Pich
Lisa Muloma — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc, Petitioner
Lisa Muloma — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent