Does the Samson v. California decision extending 'Suspicionless Searches' to parolees apply to 'Suspicionless Seizures' by prosecutors that prevent courthouse access and attorney consultation without violating constitutional amendments?

in this petition goes to the status of approximately 3,668,800 in the United States 1: 1. Does the Samson v. California, 47 U.S. 843 (2006), Court decision subjecting parolees ’ to “Suspicionless Searches ” extend to “Suspicionless Seizures ” that can be used by State Prosecutor ’s to specifically prevent the parolee from traveling to the courthouse, consulting with his attorney to receive a mistrial without violating their 1 st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments? Bureau of Justice Statistics, (2024, May); Probation and Parole in the United States, 2022. ii