No. 24-6554
Adriano Cortez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admission government-tolling statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the admission of evidence related to the defendant's prior actions violates the Due Process Clause and whether the government can invoke tolling provisions beyond the standard limitations period
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I» \vft«4W )B U.SXc^vBZ^O Violates Wt. HPfVi Amend men 4 CDue^lVoceSS^), ff ho Evidence U)a$ ^ resen 4«d fta,<Wt\04 fried 4o determine. -Vhe, 'jiorpoSe an A ^Ven\ of iW ^efendard-'-S Olsen UL« JL. If fte answer 4o fV>e fvr$>\ aoesVion ^ fo^Wwpnex^ 'presenVed «. Yltaft , loifKln |KeChfuk of WdahonSperiod/ Can ft? Governmoif \nvo)kt \l UXX.£K ),Mongol denU^ ?T o CfergjA ^ V Cm.tt* «$V to ^ SWoVe 0? lim,W 10nS. vu ui, * -h “u '”*sfrom-tV ? ten& dotlice «“P^n Pof5°cxn I
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Adriano Cortez
Adriano Cortez — Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent