No. 24-6557
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: attempted-enticement criminal-statute government-overreach motion-to-dismiss statutory-interpretation trial-court-error
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court committed clear error in denying the motion to dismiss the indictment for attempted enticement under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED CLEAR ERROR DENYING THE MOTTON TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT DUE TO LACK OF PERSUASION FOR THE ATTEMPTED ENTICEMENT? WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT OVEREXTENDED THE REACH OF THE STATUTE OF 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) WHEN IT CRIMINALIZED THE DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT? 1
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-04-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent