Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in multiple legal interpretations regarding statutory application and judicial procedure in a criminal case involving a minor

1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in includinip the Government's post-trial misinterpretation of Florida Statute § 794.05 and 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a), despite precedent in United States v. Scrushy, 721 F.3d 1288 (11th Clr. requiring consideration of such evidence when it could produce a different outcome. 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit misapplied the "use of a minor" element under 18 U.S.C, \ 2252(a)(2)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 25, conflicting with United States v, X-Citement Video, Inc.! U.S. 64 (1994), which requires that the minor be actively employed, persuaded, or coerce' the production of illicit material. 3. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in denying Petitioner's request for judicial notice of Florida Statute § 794.05's 1996 amendment which limited its applicability to individuals o\ 24 years old, despite the court's duty under Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc., 187 F.3d 1271 i Cir. 1999), to take judicial notice of adjudicative facts beyond reasonable dispute. 4. Whether the Eleventh Circuit improperly invoked the "law of the case" doctrine to preclL reconsideration of issues that were not fully litigated in prior proceedings, conflicting with Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605 (1983), and United States v. Palmer, 16 U.S. 6T0 (181 which require that courts adhere to clear statutory language when interpreting criminal liability. 5. Whether the Government's actions in pressuring a witness, as documented in the swon affidavit of Alexus Smith, violated due process ana led to a fundamentally unfair trial, necessitating a new trial under the principles established in Napue (1959), and United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985).v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 26^ 6. Whether the coercive pressure applied by the Government, which led the key witness t attempt suicide due to threats of prosecution, deportation, and psychological manipulator irreparably tainted her testimony, violating Petitioner's right to a fair trial. UST OF PARTIES ^ All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. i 1 All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all