No. 24-6560
Tamaz Pasternak, aka Tomas Pasternak v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-law federal-statute fraud-scheme property-deception statutory-interpretation wire-fraud
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a scheme to induce a transaction in property through deception, but which contemplates no harm to any property interest, constitutes a scheme to defraud under the federal wire fraud statute
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a scheme to induce a transaction in property through deception, but which contemplates no harm to any property interest, constitutes a scheme to defraud under the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343 , the question presented in Kousisis v. United States, No. 23– 909 (U.S.) (cert. granted June 17 , 2024; argued Dec. 9, 2024 ).
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-17
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2025)
Attorneys
Tamaz Pasternak, aka Tomas Pasternak
Daniel George Habib — Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Petitioner
Daniel George Habib — Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent