Are the inferences of likely guilt and of actual guilt from a finding of disposition to commit sex offenses in California's standard criminal jury instruction (CALCRIM 1191B) irrational and contrary to the 14th Amendment's due process guarantee?

Are the inferences of likely guilt and of actual guilt (the latter if there is corroborating evidence) from a finding of disposition to commit sex offenses recited in California’s standard criminal jury instruction (CALCRIM 1191B) for cases in which a defendant is charged with multiple sex offenses irrational, and thereby contrary to the 14th Amendment’s due process guarantee? iiSTATEMENT OF RELATED CASESPeople v. Isaac Garcia Bracamontes, number H048925, California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District. Judgment entered June 28, 2024.People v. Isaac Garcia Bracamontes, number S286311, California Supreme Judgment entered September 11, 2024.