No. 24-6614
Benjamin Dale Marshall v. United States
Tags: criminal-charges defendant-rights due-process government-prosecution sentencing-prejudice timing-of-charges
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does due process require the government to bring charges for crimes committed close in time so that the timing of the charges does not prejudice the defendant at sentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Does due process require the government to bring charges for crimes committed close in time so that the timing of the charges does not prejudice the defendant at sentencing? i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2025)
Attorneys
Benjamin Marshall
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent