No. 24-6621

Curtis Brown v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure fifth-amendment judicial-discretion sentencing-conditions supervised-release
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a district court must orally pronounce all discretionary standard conditions of supervised release and make an individualized assessment under the Fifth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

I. Under the Fifth Amendment, is a district court required to orally pronounce at sentencing all discretionary “standard conditions” of supervised release and to make an individualized assessment as to whether those conditions are reasonably related to the sentencing factors and involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary under the circumstances?

Docket Entries

2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-05-28
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-05-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-05-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 28, 2025.
2025-05-05
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 7, 2025 to May 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 7, 2025.
2025-04-03
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 7, 2025 to May 7, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-07
Response Requested. (Due April 7, 2025)
2025-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-03-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 26, 2025)

Attorneys

Curtis Brown
Valarie LinnenAttorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent