Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should review a case involving alleged constitutional rights violations and medical negligence related to cancer treatment

(cott 7INUE 1» 15 mv wire Mailta jo life more important then JURIS DI CTloM ? (A) PETITIONER STAMPONE SAis N.O. (6) VHIT6D STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEWARK, HJ SAYS Y£S* (c) UtSt Court OF APPEALS THIR0 CIRCUIT SAiS VES* (P) U>S CouR T OF APPEALS 3RP CIRCUIT REHEARING SAYS YES* 2* Does THIS CASE HAVE MERIT ? (A) PETITIONER STAMPONE SAiS YES> (B) u,s, district court of newark ,nx magistrate judge 5AV5 THIS CASE HAS MERIT DOMING TW£ FlflST PHoNE CONFERENCE* (SEE RECORDING OF FIRST PHoNE CONFERENCE) 3* WAS MARTA Jo CoMpETlVE, ALERT, ORIENTED A NO A0LE To MARC HER. OWN DECISIONS ON AMP AFTER. AUG 057 2^, Bol*? ? (A) PETITIONER STAMPONE SAiS YES* (A) defendant Judge David M* mur Kowski in Cdmplaintsays KJo* (c) 5LoAM KETTERlNGi (ONC OF TH£ BEST HoSPlTAlIN THE V/oRtD) SAis Yes. (see mafia 's medical report in complaint *) (D) Mayo clinic (one of the best hospital in. The world ) says yes, (see Marta's medical records in exhibits of complaint and exhibit TV in this petition *) (e) state Judge Joseph r* Klein said Both marta jo a»d x ale comp erne enough To be married on September % Zon.($EE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE/LICENSE IN complaint exhibits *) 4* WAS MARTA J0 AND PETITION STAMP0N6 DEPRIVED OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ?(a)FETITI0NER SAIS YES* (/continue ON next page)on N£KT PAGE , 3 (b) U' 5. DI5TRICT couter DIP NoT MAIC£ A DECISION ON THIS* Cd U-S. CoufCT of APPEALS DIO NoT MAKE A DECISION ON THL5CD) U.S. Court Of APPEALS ^ID^N oTMaKE A DECISION ON THIS* 5. WHAT DEPEMDAMT5 HAVE A AAoRAL OBLIGATION ANO/oR FIDUCIARY DUTY To HELP MARTA FINISH HER CANCER? (A) PETITIONER 5AY5 ACL, (B) CMDISTRICT Court DID NoT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS ISSuECC) U-S. CoufiJ OF APPEALS DID NoT MAKE A DECISION ON THISCD) ITS, COURT OF APPEALS RE HEARING DIP NoT MAKE A DECISION/ GWHAT DEFENDANTS ARE DIRECTLY o/L INDIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FoR THE NEGLIGENT OiSRECARP OF EXTREME CRULITY, ELDER abuse crule anp unusal punishment that led to the •wrong full Death of my wipe marta jo stam Pone 7 La) Both plaintiffs marta jo amp Frederick STampone clearly decri bed )n Detail in their complaint .h^w each depenp ant was directly O/C in directlv responsible Cb) ll s. D/strict Cou/lt did not make -a Decision on this . Cel U-S mflbfEf COURT Of APPEALS DID N&T MAKE A Di&lSlOhS. CD) U.5, Cou/lT OF APPEALS REHEARING DID NoT MAKE A DECISION7« DID ALL DEFENDANTS KNoW THAT MY WIFE MARTA Jo WouLD DIE IF SHE DID NoT FINISH Hid CANCER TREATMENTS ? (A) PLAINTI FP5 SENT CERTIFIED LETTERS To ALL DEFENDANTS informing Them with medical reports * All letters were IGNORED THEN PLAINTIFFS FILED COMPLAINT AMD STILL No HELP then Plaintiffs filed a number of medical emercency Motions and still no Help(B) U-S. DISTRICT Court DENIED ALL PLAINTIFFS MEDICAL EMERGENCY Motions * Cel u-sCou/LT OF APPEALS DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS (D) LAS, Cou/LT OF APPEALS HE HEARING DID NoT MA\(C A DECISION* 8WERE ALL DEFENDANTS PRoPERLT SERVED ComPLAINT AnD SUMMONS? (A) PETITIONER SAYS YES/ AND ALL DEFENDANTS EXCEPT ALU 6 1 SA WYER. ANSWERED THE COMPLAINT AND MoTlOH5 i ? ETiT|oN£R DISMISSED HERFR6M COMPLAINT BECAUSE HER HU53AN D VISIT PETITIONER AMI? ToLD HIM THAT HE WouLD TRY To MeLP MARTA* (B) THE U,5, DISTRICT Coo/LT DISMISSED PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP BECAUSE PETITIONER DID NoT 5EIWE NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY CENERAL* Court RULES STATB THAI Some ONE ^FILING A Complaint against the united statas and/or president most The united states attorney general and nothing about SERVING A STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL* PETITIONER PRoPERLY SERVED PRESIDENT DONALD T£UMP UNITED STATES ATTORNEY general william barr and the united states * new jersey ATTORNEY GENERAL RECEIVED THE COMPLAINT AND FILED AN answer * therefore he participated and the £*$& court should consider president trump served * (c) THE U,S. Court OF APPEALS DID NoT MAKE A RULING ON THIS* (D) u*s* court of appeals rehearing did Not make a decision * THIS IS A AAAJolL ISSUE THAT THIS COURT MUST MAKE A DECISION and Publish it For the