No. 24-6626
Stanford Wall v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-law criminal-procedure cross-examination evidence-law witness-credibility
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, consistent with the Confrontation Clause, courts must apply a presumption favoring cross-examination of a government witness's general character for truthfulness, or whether courts may completely prohibit cross-examination that tests the witness's credibility or reliability without applying such a presumption?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether, consistent with the Confro ntation Clause, courts must apply a presumption favoring cross-examination of a government witness’s general character for truthfulness, or whether courts may completely prohibit crossexamination that tests the witness’s credib ility or reliability without applying such a presumption? prefix PARTIES ,
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Stanford Wall
Caitlin Howard — Law Office of Caitlin E. Howard, Petitioner
Caitlin Howard — Law Office of Caitlin E. Howard, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent