No. 24-6632
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr. v. Andrea Lippman Loelo, et al.
Tags: amendment-opportunity constitutional-rights court-dismissal due-process judicial-discretion procedural-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-04-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court denied the Petitioner's due process rights by dismissing the case without notice or opportunity to be heard and without allowing amendment of the complaint
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Did the lower court deny the Petitioner his due process right to notice and opportunity to be heard when the case was dismissed and closed without Petitioner being granted the right to argue why the complaint stated a cause of action, and alternatively, was deprived of an opportunity to amend the complaint because the judge closed the case ?
Docket Entries
2025-04-28
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2025-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2025)
Attorneys
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Samuel Lee Smith Jr. — Petitioner