Whether the District Court improperly exercised discretion in denying default judgment under federal civil procedure rules

^-ec> IdcdtS 6^ cP -fir+hjum)d<5^ X05 -VW DOtfdoo^ 6 f P^n/T^U^o/c ■ On Mi da^L,J -fimt in error,\, 2. IM 0 4-W UrC,4c6 S-Mes c5 1 isMr? cJCo^rc-l00» d^UdnrW/cJ' g-f Panny^luCn'/c. In no+ dt-fv-ull jadjm*/^ und<u~ fcdosai R<->lt of c}^}/ PmQicfaoe-&hu(yc i'P# d'f&otck&n 3^ 1 d 4-\VL Dr)dt6 Sd*\-tr Q'lTsdrxciCaurX i^n ~MjL /4 s dricrriior lfVMc)c)U D'/crbncP of pw ci Ct*J-k of CouriAO-f 6u{&ul4 Jad<ym<y74 -VU«V if Gu-bmabtc cinder /edej^/ fdoLv a{ c)<j) / ffbUL&UrtrcgcoJinj Go dey r<Jlx_ <3^ Senj/csL af Gneusir -b C0fHpti>n4underPuit y(j) af w>U-r of owlu cm b"t p^ti(xdurt . 4. b) 2> D\ sMnoJ" Jlsd^t^ oh ) n <3 cn i( j n § 40 k£ri M <icV-A,;^ £ er-bnj-o-f )<ubhh)r JliSCrcJio* 67/1 tv/dtji'hrL,usr lu / “M? L> ■/-0^ MjunX S' Did -Mu. DW4rioD JLrd^ ■ (j^u-<TC htS discredits c/rims bd/J^5, \ A (3 1 S yvi 1 if s' ! nprtjvdi Cc as ^fl^<U_r is SlHlllo CAfirfe5y <rf Ptftn4cnJ-/£nrp,r l3