Whether the District Court abused its discretion by applying improper legal standards and hastily resorting to summary judgment to deny a claim of continuous violation

in the petition is whether the United States District Court for the District of Vermont in Burlington abused its discretion by applying improper legal standards and hastily resorting to summary judgment to deny my claim of continuous violation against the respondents. 2. Whether my defamation claim against respondent Seven Days, Inc. sufficiently pleads equitable tolling just with direct evidence and by presenting detailed factual allegations from which, when collectively considered, equitable tolling could plausibly be inferred. IV 3. Does Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibit employers from engaging in defamatory misconduct based on race, religion, ethnicity, or national origin? 4. Whether the statute of limitations applies even in cases of ongoing misconduct. See Local Motion, Inc. 5. Whether my assertion of a section 1985 conspiracy against Seven Days, Inc., is considered the introduction of a new claim? Further, whether the statute of limitation timebarred my complaint against respondent Seven Days, Inc., even though all the evidence points to the respondent's misconduct as the cause for my inability to file within the specified deadline. 6. Is a newspaper that participates in an act to advance a conspiracy liable under section 1985 ? Does the misconduct of the office of the prosecutor and a major publication constitute a. section 1985 violation in this case? 7. Whether a plaintiff can be precluded from invoking a statute in opposition to a summary judgment motion, even if he expressed the argument of the statute in his original complaint, Amended Complaint, responses, replies, and Second Amended Complaint? 8. Is a co-conspirator newspaper protected under the First Amendment from a defamation claim? Is the hit-piece published by respondent Seven Days Newspaper considered protected speech? 9. Who is a public figure in this case? 10. Whether an employer making employment decisions such as promotion based on racial, religious, ethnic, sex, or national origin stereotypes or assumptions about an employee's abilities, traits, or performance constitutes a section 1981, Title VII, and Title VI. See Greater Burlington YMCA. 11. Whether my claims against respondent Greater Burlington YMCA is time-barred given the respondent misconduct fits within the continue violation doctrine? vi 12. Whether in cases of two, three, four, or multiple overlapping statutes of limitations caused by a continuing wrong stemming from systemic racism, discrimination, or prejudice, in such cases, a single investigation and the evid