No. 24-6655

Raul Hiram Mata-Gardea v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: almendarez-torres appellate-jurisdiction downward-departure indictment-requirement pre-removal-felony sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fifth Circuit had appellate jurisdiction to review the district court's denial of a motion for downward departure under the Sentencing Guidelines and whether the existence of a pre-removal felony conviction is a fact that must be pleaded in the indictment or proven to a jury

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Whether the Fifth Circuit had appellate jurisdiction to review the district court’s denial of a motion for downward depart ure under the Sentencing Guidelines. 2. Whether, under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), the existence of a pre-removal fe lony conviction is a fact that must be pleaded in the indictment and either proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted during a defendant’s guilty plea. ii DIRECTLY

Docket Entries

2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-03-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2025)

Attorneys

Raul Hiram Mata-Gardea
James Matthew WrightOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent