Whether summary judgment should be granted when genuine issues of material fact exist and evidence credibility is questioned

1. Should UTSA ’s summary judgement be granted when unsolved genuine issues of material facts are presented, and the credibility of evidence is questioned? The Court of Appeals ’ decision conflicts with the following court decisions: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317,322 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., All U.S. 242, 248 (1986). Hahn v. Sargent , 523 F.2d 461,464 (1st Cir.1975) Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541,550-5(1999). 2. Did Lan suffer discrimination due to her national origin? The Court of Appeals ’ interpretation of McDonnell Douglas indirect method of proof conflicts with the following court decisions: McDonnell Douglas Carp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 794 (1973) Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, 120 S.Ct. 2097, 2108 (2000) Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 242 (1976) 3. Did Lan suffer retaliation in the reinstatement petition and re-admission inquiry? The Court of Appeals ’ decision conflicts with the following court decisions: Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co. 238 F.3d 674,684 (5th Cir. 2001); Teague v. Williamson County, No. 22-50202 (5th Cir. 2022); Evans v. City of Houston, 246 F.3d 344, 254 (5th Cir. 2001); Zamora v. City of Houston, NO. 4:07-4510 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2010); Pardo-Kroneinann v. Jackson, 541 F. Supp. 2d 210 (D.D.C. 2008); Romano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 284 N.J. Super. 543 (App. Div. 1995); Kalinoski v. Gutierrez, 435 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2006)