No. 24-6665

Craig LaFayette Stingley v. John Laczkowski, et al.

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2025-02-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment due-process equal-protection medical-malpractice non-economic-damages state-action
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment HealthPrivacy
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Wisconsin's Medical Malpractice Non-Economic Damages CAP Law violate the 14th Amendment's State Action Clause by arbitrarily abridging the constitutional right to redress and depriving citizens of equal protection and due process?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

I .* Petitioner respectfully asserts that this SCOTUS will recognize these questions expose an “Unconstitutional and Discriminatory ” matter of national significance : Does Wisconsin ’s Medical Malpractice Non-Economic Damages CAP Law, along with similar laws in 26 other states, violate the 14th Amendment ’s State Action Clause by arbitrarily abridging the constitutional right to redress and depriving citizens of equal protection and due process, ultimately forcing individuals to abandon their right to redress or proceed as disadvantaged ProSe Litigants, subsequently imposing an undue burden by making the contingency arrangement financially unviable (factor known by Defense Counsel), for personal injuiy attorneys to provide representation (see Affidavits pgs. 23-34 in

Docket Entries

2025-04-07
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-03-13
Waiver of right of respondent John Laczkowski, et al. to respond filed.
2024-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2025)

Attorneys

Craig LaFayette Stingley
Craig LaFayette Stingley — Petitioner
Craig LaFayette Stingley — Petitioner
John Laczkowski, et al.
David J. PlinerCorneille Law Group, LLC, Respondent
David J. PlinerCorneille Law Group, LLC, Respondent