Victor Charles Rogers v. Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Whether a court can deny a certificate of appealability (COA) when filing actual innocence claims and whether DNA evidence showing the petitioner is not the perpetrator constitutes a violation of constitutional rights
No question identified. : V •Ud. Iki me Supreme court nr the uhineb States VilToR Charles Routes* Pu>Rom.r i/« Bobby Lumpkih Rt.sponcU.nt ■PETITION} FdR \JRit nr Cr-RTinRPRi Pro St. fkhfionts' Vic-tof Ro^^rs *UoX^^U (JqIUl.il. Pack Unit 3Ht>e Oetlifit^ Pac.iL RdUcntoSoU TX T7M»t ftscliviB ® 2 6 2024y> SSgigjjggy Q0tST(0h} PRasshimb dircjuib dcur& \o deny a C.QPi fitc-hual-' lnnou,noe.^ • cp, Xs. iP p'i'^L V afjo to Mioi look dtb PLc M^rih *P a ScicCjeJShStj p&.f rf'/h*n Xor C.Q& ijjUZ'h Alm^f C*(Jruu\}I SlnO Ce^nC^J. 3* XxXt' PL a, C.ouAs Sct^poJd ho loo/c. a!-' XLt^ CkcJLions eP Pke^ -tr'ial fiPPernty tJkc^vx Piling (Le>n S-Pp'ucJ'tv'e^ cA^mol &X CLounfe^l? (’4/ (jJhsyn \3>hdPi itYiony sboUtx hkaf ped'Aion^r /S JQ&h XLt^ person £t t^tood Sl,0u?i3cj &X OiCpuctj/ y) /? & Ce,si 6-e. ^ X’ Xsn■b ik c*. U/tp/af'i&n op Cl p-eP/k/oner S dons IiPlaPionO) t)Cjhb L^lieto Xh(L X^/b! /OluPy^r Ones ko pf'i etl LJ>tXk ouiX CJ ■O'f'i' /S7/J C< l^LS f , P)£fI. Xs it (er a proCe-darc if Ae.'Po.aft (jb&n PlJnnQon a p t-^Xr/c, / /yioXfonf? 0 to £>< XinX iP a ihefahay,ap pedi h e>„ e.r3 donS h ku X,os>4j nfe,/ &f)e>uS XL<^juda^t k<> qo mP& /C"^ ^ ^/,'^^on ?ulhesn L-r/al /1^>U +Ac ,1 PARTIES Vfel-i'&r J ft ft^5port de.rt f'j &OB&V LDMPiatiboZ&yCs t dVOO Ddltsc^fkcJL fCt, fdoUaSoha. Ik "7~7&(c>$f oey ess PR/csd DP/MiohlS And Oftde g Sc.pte.mht.r IS.lQQh denp/cj-lon Aqj.Se.faA I Assault. *£T$DO£'l April $/ I442L ‘ OtK/'-cJ' Appeaf eiAPi'riWetJI Rqj Jurti. a-f kdoc&r Ccr-pus d/S/flisStxf £ D03 “Tc*. flp-f.bi.Kts §2(e ,f Dklflr Ce.sh/tq. dis/vusi td tn HJ .Qno'4-CariPV. Shf^. AtH~ Qf~ 00X41' Ck <z',s;f AcJ. k)t» 4:4^2 <ts3 K!<snuCif'YtST Ao. mvc. ._)Ct n ry STuA(L A9, AoQQ-'fjJn'f »l Jnftlwir Corpus ■fii le-ctf i 4-c$ W <5 c.2d. t 4s Ud eJ/srv/sst-J / Gppjuif ~f>H<x4 m sth C/rcuit CoA denied Unly i =3<5<2*3tun {Acted. T).AOTS4~ 3S'(i.S.C.f Q 3 CQ iJr'dat Laheas Corpus d ,S M/SSed AunasJr 23' 3L02-HApplied f-e United 34c>feJ LdOfLl OF Appeals' de.flit.cJ C0f\ . Oct b ht^ Q.£Q Iff. if.e.Lc.af'rnq i7yi hern C ~ c)-ryi f *> A • ‘v-BAs, IS OF <JU&lSOlCTION -J urfsAicblon IS Eon Pe.rretd•hkiS (Lourf by bLe ilSS t/pPe-m-o (Zauri' Rules /olc^Ctnd I3(l), 1 Ao LAuftd Sbah^s Disf'nc-f' daurha ki Par bke Souik Pnsbndr d,sa*/sseJ JUTtS AaA (Warok 3tl > 3oa.Lt, P^kii/'eCorpus LJifh tPu A erne&s prejud t’o40 or* oh May H, «30«24 hufirx^ 6nfll ■Pa.tlecl -i o abbc In Otufkori 2.0i lan bo SgLXS-C* b 'd.Q.H'b (h)(3) (R) • PeJ" tktoner GJ bed Par G r'eSiOCinhc^ Ond eOGS rl’OHIe.CI En banc OH Oobo heu~ Q/JtOj^A PerTko J?G\reaSonc* Tkt(Zourb Polled bo ru I honb -for acku&{~ ) V)f) OConCe~> Ond (ZonSbruebi i/e^ Donictl ab . , . Z>22> I Ii/jc l/jolttes f>M,,„e.rs £W Proton <Ll«uj«. of kL. D.S. 14l-Uher Gppt6le.cH Par a (ZOA d Aenud on fXucj.s, ,3o<IQPar a procedure, I bo bilo purSuctn t~<5| *-» bUt merib PiS e on on Is&u nS&J * _5ot, TfoGui 'Verb! nr99i n i/> £0hl£TirUT lOMAl_ P/ZotZ/sioMS fttib STATUTES UNlTEb STATES GatiST/TLtr/oti Amendrvunb XI)/ lJhJI TEfb STATES SatiSTl T iJ T/oti Amend m&nT l/ Gnol V( -Sr/vrgMfeK/r ar ihl cfse foitt ton<er \/l cj-0t~ CLarles R 0/ye-C£ i u^sti Oorw/tobed o4 oqe^Cara bed hef~ \?3, IQQI, ^ Ir/a ) (Zourb held h/J Sexual QSCauii an Sepb Pj-obrin I l\LGnnCj in (Da rob t IQtfl, ~Tno> / (ZounSe / // jeo! S /V)oHonS biSLo/cry b0 SuppresjTon aC PU inti attorney and bU ttisitf/cb^tt on mobibhS uoUh bU bhJb bosb La blue D.A Uh ,‘hud UnPil bke f brLey boob pobiki LJtkb&ub 4U khocal&Aem P,ro mthe Trt a I )ucly..<o bo I ft arney birb Ac, LOoulcl tu(e badeTrtcl (ZounsUehCo . mi,Cenck rtcrl ij u^e, uc^o.ncj on \/aa>l} en, ^ h h'ia! u>i'l-UaUus bc,n aher9 bLe rJ&oLeJ, of 4-1,4,bno l jud^. / ;•# : rTf'tal (LounsJ to 0 ruling dlounJe-l -Pon led to /nWi/teu? to1 Vn cSSes )P Ac had Ac Would kaVe learned /A UJ>QJ g -A.rvi a I<lp mottonS* 0 in 0pQiO4,r UjlnO Skopptd tLt, petitioner \dU Ue ignoreJ U. 7U t^ia) CloansJ do /Ac C&mplei m a nJOc/cr objected A k^<s>totn<j uob 0 petitioner war otter ^Ac stated tLe police told kerTWe Srienh'its testified dkt^y Aid