No. 24-6683
Ferrell Walker v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability clisby-rule constitutional-rights eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals properly applied the Clisby v. Jones precedent in determining the Certificate of Appealability and potentially violating the Petitioner's Sixth and Fourth Amendment rights
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the determination of the Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability follows their own Circuit Precedent under Clisby v. Jones, 960 F.2d 925, 936 (11th Cir. 1992) (en banc), thereby denying Petitioner under the United States Constitutions Sixth Amendment and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the United States Constitutions Fourth Amendment. I i.
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-20
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent