No. 24-6696
James R. Turner, III v. Edward Rapp
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-protections due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion recusal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-05-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying in forma pauperis status and dismissing an appeal without proper constitutional consideration
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals erred in denying petitioner ’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in violation of and applicable constitutional protections. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals properly dismissed the petitioner ’s appeal for lack of an arguable basis in law or fact, conflicting with Supreme Court precedent. 3. Whether the District Court judge erred in refusing to recuse themselves despite circumstances that would reasonably question their impartiality.
Docket Entries
2025-05-05
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
2025-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2025)
2024-11-13
Application (24A477) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 28, 2025.
2024-11-07
Application (24A477) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 30, 2024 to February 28, 2025, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
James R. Turner
James R. Turner III — Petitioner