Whether a pro se petitioner can challenge multiple procedural aspects of a habeas corpus petition and court proceedings

No question identified. : QUESTIONS Petitioner, Jason Krumback (prose) submits the following questions of law under 28 U.S.C.A. section 1331. 1. Can a person be a witness after sentencing? 2. Can testimony be withheld after it has been given? 3. Is a probation condition evidence? 4. Is a “no-contact order ” evidence? 5. Must a court screen a petition of habeas corpus under rule 4 of habeas 2254 cases? 6. Must a court only consider the court record of that are addressed in the petition of habeas corpus under rule 5(c)-(d) of habeas 2254 cases? 7. Must a court rule on the merits? 8. Is a wrongful conviction, also known as innocence? 9. Is exhaustion procedural default? 10. Is procedural default excused under actual innocence? a T II PARTIES 1) South Dakota Federal District Court. 2) United States 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. RELATED CASES: State v. Krumback, Cr22-3305 Krumback v. Revas, 4:23-cv-04155 (federal Court Case) Krumback v. Bittinger, 24-2254 (Appeal Case) Page 2 of 23