What standard or procedure should the Supreme Court establish to ensure judicial compliance with Brady Rules material disclosure and prevent judicial corruption that violates due process?

Petitioner entitled petition "AFFIDAVIT FOR JUDICIAL DISCLOSURE AND/OR DISQUALIFICATION, RECUSAL APPLICATION SUPPORT TO REMAND " under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455 and Judicial Conduct Canons 1 and 2 submitted to attach the TRANSFEROR-COURT a transfer order (United States District Court for the District of Delaware ) on 11-17-2022, which docket record petition appeared being-had-been altered, deleted, or destroyed, erased to the nonexistent state on the CM/ECF (Case Management Electronic Court File) from the TRANSFEREE-COURT (United States District Court for the Northern District Texas) court docket with court record evidentiary communications or proceedings taken place of transaction between defendants and defense attorneys by means In Re Tandys Ex Parte violation defined by 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 505, 1028, 1029, 1030,1341; Petitioner filed Judicial Misconduct Complaints with the Third Circuit Court on 03-31-2023 (JC#03-23-90024) and 08-29-2023 (JC#03-23-90085) collectively specifically alleging subject judge, judges violation of 18 U.S.C. §666(a). Despite exhaustion all remedies, the Third Circuit dismiss-to-close petitioners the complaints in the pattern abuse discretion aggravated with a tanned in res judicata. So that the question is: 1. Above Model Rule 3.8 governing the ethical obligation the lower courts, what standard, rule, or procedure should the Court amendable its compliance to ensure Brady Rules material and disclosure from subject judges corruption preeminence to suppression or exemption that violates the Due Process judicial disability jurisdictional disqualification an accuracy determination the criminal culpability? 2. How should the Court to situate low courts records before Congress for the exculpatory impeachable evidentiary proceeding on the Brady Rules material whereat mens rea In Re Tandys ex parte undermine the judicial process integrity contravenes the public interest? 1. "Brady Material" , Brady Obligation"; See, e.g., Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).