Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit incorrectly interpreted the Sentencing Guidelines' relevant conduct provisions for jointly undertaken criminal activity when it held that unforeseeable sexual assaults were 'reasonably foreseeable'

Whether• the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit incorrectly interpreted the Sentencing Guidelines' relevant conduct provisions for jointly undertaken criminal activity, when it held that unforeseeable sexual assaults of a home invasion victim by participants other than Mr. Martin — as specifically found by the District Court —were nevertheless "reasonably foreseeable" within the meaning of U.S.S.G. §