No. 24-6759
Paul Corey Martinez v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-law federal-statute gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is an obvious and irreconcilable clash between § 922(g)(1) and the rights protected by the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
is: Whether there is an obvious and irreconcilable clash between § 922(g)(1) and the rights protected by the Second Amendment .
Docket Entries
2025-05-19
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-11
Memorandum for the United States in Opposition of United States submitted.
2025-04-11
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-04-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 12, 2025.
2025-04-03
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 11, 2025 to May 12, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2025)
Attorneys
Paul Martinez
Taylor Wills Edwards Brown — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
Taylor Wills Edwards Brown — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent