No. 24-6763

Jonetta L. Grieme v. Shawn Collie, Buchanan County Drug Strike Force, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: color-of-law due-process fraudulent-concealment sexual-misconduct statute-of-limitations witness-tampering
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding the petitioner's claims time-barred despite allegations of fraudulent concealment, duress, and coercion by a federal officer

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Questions To Consider 1. Was the petitioner, Jonetta Grieme ’s Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution violated by the Missouri federal courts? 2. Did the Western District Courts err in granting summary judgment to the defendant Shawn Collie after he was caught knowingly lying to the internal affairs detective? 3. Did the Western District Courts Of Missouri Err in granting the defendant Shawn Collie summary judgement after petitioner informed the courts that Shawn Collie was tampering with petitioner's witness? 4. Did Jonetta provide the Western District Court Of Missouri with enough material facts to be granted a jury trial? (A-17) 5. Would surveillance of the officer, Shawn Collie going into the petitioner, Jonetta Grieme ’s cell demanding audio tapes from her that she recorded of the defendant Shawn Collie be worth granting the Petitioner ’s Motion to Compel surveillance and help the courts to justly rule on this claim? 6. Did the Missouri Courts err in not enforcing Jonettas subpoenas for her booking desk and arrest records when petitioner Grieme asked the courts to Compel them? 7. Did the Western District Court of Missouri err in not considering all the evidence that Jonetta Grieme provided them with before granting summary judgement? 8. Does “DURESS and COERCION ” toll the statute of limitations? (American Jurisprudence vol. 34. Pd. 193.194: “Doctrine of Duress and Undue influence ”) (i) 9. Did Shawn Collie ’s actions towards Jonetta Grieme cause the petitioner to believe if she didn't quit telling on him for his sexual misconduct that her freedom, life and safety would be jeopardized? 10. Was there enough evidence presented to the Missouri Courts to prove Shawn Collie was targeting Jonetta Grieme? (A-2 (a): A-2 (b): A-5: A-6: A-8) 11. Was there enough evidence presented to the Missouri Courts to prove Shawn was acting “UNDER COLOR OF LAW ” and intimidating Jonetta Grieme? 12. Should the Missouri Courts consider the "Doctrine of Duress and Coercion" after the defendant Shawn Collie was caught knowingly lying and placing the petitioner in restraints? 13. Is tampering with a witness a form of Duress and Coercion" (A-4 P-97-41) 14. Did Shawn Collie have a duty as a federal officer to disclose the facts to the Internal Affairs detective? (United States v. Irwin. 654 F.2d 6711 ? 15. Did the Western District Court of Missouri err by not considering the “Doctrine of Fraudulent Concealment ” when the defendant knowingly lied and refused to produce the petitioners booking desk and arrest records? 16. Did the Missouri courts err by not considering the “Doctrine of Fraudulent Concealment ” after Shawn Collie was caught knowingly lying about having any encounters with the petitioner Jonetta Grieme? 17. Did Jonetta have proper representation and a fair trial as a Pro Se litigant in this case? 18. Is lying to a detective a form of Fraudulent Concealment? (18 U.S.C. S 10011 (ii) 19. Does fraudulent concealment of material facts toll the statute of limitations in America? ( RSMo Section 516.280: “Doctrine of Fraudulent Concealment “) 20. Is Jonettta ’s claims time barred given the fact of evidence that proves “ Duress, Coercion and fraudulent concealment ” was happening ever since Jonetta reported Shawn Collie to Mike Strong? 21. Should judgment be overturned in the plaintiff Jonetta Griemes favor? 22. Did Jonetta Grieme produce enough medical documentation to the Western District Courts proving her PTSD and disability started not long after Shawn Collie drove her to a secluded area and tossed an evidence bagging into her lap containing drugs, exposed his penis to her then brought a S.W.A.T team into her home why her mother was at work? (A-9) 23. Did Jonetta Grieme provide a Neurology medical report proving she began to have trouble with her short term memory in 2016? (A-9 pq. 1-7) “DATE OF DISCOVERY ” 24. Did Jonetta Grieme provide the medical documentation showing her PTSD diagnosis changed in 2

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-19
Waiver of Shawn Collie, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent Shawn Collie, et al. to respond filed.
2024-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2025)
2024-07-16
Application (24A51) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 13, 2024.
2024-07-11
Application (24A51) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 15, 2024 to September 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Jonetta L. Grieme
Jonetta L. Grieme — Petitioner
Jonetta L. Grieme — Petitioner
Shawn Collie, et al.
David Stephen BakerFisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, LLP, Respondent
David Stephen BakerFisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, LLP, Respondent