No. 24-6766
David Lynn Griffith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether historical drugs purchased by someone other than the defendant constitutes reliable evidence at sentencing to support the purity of methamphetamine
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
WHETHER HISTORICAL DRUGS PURCHASED BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE DEFENDANT CONSTITUTES RELIABLE EVIDENCE AT SENTENCING TO SUPPORT THE PURITY OF METHAMPHETAMINE? ii
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2025)
Attorneys
David Griffith
Edward J. Rymsza III — Miele & Rymsza, P.C., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent